【作者】 廉德瑰；

【Author】 Lian Degui;

【机构】 上海外国语大学日本文化经济学院；

【摘要】 钓鱼列岛的主权归属问题在学术研究领域是一个需要认真考证并不断深化的长期而复杂过程。关于甲午战争后钓鱼列岛的归属问题,日方提出中国从1895年至1971年的76年间没有提出过主权要求,还说1920年的"冯冕感谢信"、《人民日报》的文章和1960年的地图等资料都证明曾经默认过钓鱼列岛属于日本。其实从日本在甲午战争期间曲解国际法关于先占的原则秘密"编入"钓鱼列岛和所谓"尖阁诸岛"名称的由来看,所谓中国76年间没有提出钓鱼列岛主权要求的说法并不属实,关于甲午战争和二战以后中国的态度,可以从国际法角度做合理说明。更多还原

【Abstract】 On the Sovereignty of Diaoyu Islands after the Sino-Japanese War,The Japanese side proposed that China did not claim sovereignty for 76 years from 1895 to 1971,and also advocated the 1920 Fengmian "letter of thanks" and an article in the People’s Daily and a map from 1960. Japanese side proposed that these proofs demonstrated that the Chinese have recognized that the Diaoyu islands belong to Japan. Although Chinese scholars have responded to such Japanese claims,Japan still argues that China only claimed the sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands after the discovery of oil in the 1970 s. To refute the Japanese arguments,apart from using a large amount of evidence from the Ming and Qing Dynasties,it is also necessary to clarify China’s attitude towards the ownership of Diaoyu Islands after the Sino-Japanese War and after the Second World War. In particular,the Fengmian "letter of thanks",the issue of the People’s Daily article and the 1960 map must be studied. By analyzing the Japanese misinterpretation of the principle of preemption in international law during the Sino-Japanese War,the origin and significance of the name "Senkaku Islands ",this article demonstrates the Japanese accusations are untenable.更多还原